Recent Comments

March 2010
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Sam Collins: England’s pragmatism worthy of praise

March 15th, 2010 by Sam Collins in England, Test cricket

cook

A day to go in Chittagong and England are five wickets away from a comprehensive victory. And no one is happy.

Why exactly? England have eschewed risk. Six batsmen. Three seamers. Trying to grind Bangladesh into the dust by not enforcing the follow-on. Pragmatism has reigned. And, barring rain (fittingly it is now raining in Dhaka) or a miracle, it will get them a win.

It’s been an efficient, unspectacular team performance – save for Paul Collingwood’s hitting and the odd jaffa from the bowlers – against a callow Bangladesh.

Isn’t that what we wanted? All the talk in the build-up to this series was of a potential banana skin for England – arrogant England, who left their captain Andrew Strauss at home.

This Test has seen runs and captaincy experience for his replacement Alastair Cook. Cook has been tested much more in the field than at the crease – a flat track making England’s seamers work harder for their wickets than they would have wanted, but it won’t do his appreciation of the game any harm. The decision to bat again has been criticised, but is there really any suggestion that the Bangladeshi tail have the technique or the temperament to last a whole day?

Six batsman rather than five has inevitably been construed as unnecessarily defensive in the context of England’s 599-6. But given the troubles of Kevin Pietersen, Michael Carberry’s debut, worries over Prior’s recent lack of Test runs and England’s preference for depth it seems understandable. It also gave them what they wanted, a massive first-innings total that made losing the game unthinkable.

The extra batsman neccessitated the choice of Steve Finn over James Tredwell – a decision that upset one or two. Given Graeme Swann’s success, England may well have wrapped things up by now if he were in tandem with Tredwell. But England don’t tour the subcontinent again until 2011-12 (and that a tour to troubled Pakistan), so surely it serves England’s interests better to assess the heart and skill of Finn and Tim Bresnan on unhelpful wickets? Looking at the brittle appearance of England’s frontline seamers, both could have important roles to play in Australia next winter.

This is not to advocate an Ashes-centric approach to team selection, but England picked a team to win this Test match, and they look like doing so without much fuss. Isn’t that enough?

Sam Collins is editor of thewisdencricketer.com

Follow him on twitter @wisdencric_sam

Posted in England, Test cricket | 3 Comments »



3 Responses to “Sam Collins: England’s pragmatism worthy of praise”

  1.   Paddy Briggs says:

    Isn’t that enough? Yeah of course it is. And Cookey has had a good game – terrific first innings knock and intelligent captaincy. And KP has given two fingers to the doubters. And Swanney just gets better…

    What’s not to like?

  2.   Josh says:

    I think everyone just wanted us to roll them over inside three days, which ignores the fact that Bangladesh aren’t quite the whipping boys some people think they are. This pitch is an absolute road, no good for test cricket, but it has been a good learning experience for Finn in particular. Bresnan has shown himself to be worthy of a squad place for the Ashes tour perhaps, if he can maintain decent form and fitness. I think this tour has provided a few answers to questions personally. Well worth it!

  3.   Paddy Briggs says:

    Bangladesh were far from a pushover. They could push England harder in Dhaka. What a shame that Monty P isn’t in the squad. To see him and Swann in tandem – especially at Dhaka which it seems will be a turner, would have been good. Good luck to Tredwell who will play in the next Test I think – but where is Monty?

Leave a Reply

Site by Anson Robson Marketing © 2010 The Wisden Cricketer All Rights Reserved